How to get your child out of foster care uk
Fostering - Temporary foster care
Key findings
Temporary foster care is the most commonly used category of foster care.
Temporary placements are less likely to break down than long term or permanent placements, probably because the period at risk is less.
About 80 per cent of admissions into temporary foster care are with parental agreement.
Many parents see temporary foster care as helpful; children and young people are unlikely to want to be in foster care although they will often accept it if their situation improves as a result.
Children in temporary foster care spend on average a year there.
Social work methods that may help prevent or shorten children’s periods in care are:
- purposeful and committed social work
- using a multi-agency approach
- using written agreements
- ensuring that contact between parents, child and foster carers takes place.
The effectiveness of therapeutic interventions alone is unclear in preventing or shortening the time spent in care.
Practice points
- Remember that you may not be able to prevent a child’s temporary placement in care and that parents often find it helpful and children may accept it.
- Remember that the circumstances surrounding the way children enter care makes all the difference so ask yourself how you can prepare them and their family for both coming into foster care and moving to a new placement.
- Remember that when you are working to prevent a child being accommodated it is very easy to overlook planning for the likelihood that this may happen. Ask yourself if you have considered this realistically and made plans for it.
- Remember to do all that you can to avoid emergency placements and ask yourself if you have made time to talk to children, to discuss the options with them and to listen to their views.
- Remember that it also helps if the child has a positive time at school and can maintain contact with friends.
- Remember that when you are working to prevent a child coming into foster care or to achieve reunification, four things have been shown to be effective, so ask yourself if you have offered the following: - purposeful and committed social work - a multi-agency approach - t- he use of written agreements - ensuring that contact takes place
What we know from research
Temporary care may be used in an emergency and also while the needs of the child are being assessed. More children are placed in temporary foster care than any other type of foster care.
Why temporary foster care?
Temporary foster care is used for a number of different purposes, and different agencies use different terms to describe it. It can be used in an emergency, for assessment, when a young person is on remand, or as a temporary home when no one else can provide care. It may provide a chance to calm an inflamed situation, to support parents who are at the end of their tether or in a crisis and to enable a risky situation to be assessed and managed. It can also be used to facilitate panning for the future.
Shared care, which is a series of short break placements with the same foster carers, offers a series of short planned breaks often, but not only to, disabled children and their families. Some schemes support parents and teenagers. The overall aim is to keep the family together in the long term; foster carers sometimes care for the parent and child together and can offer support when the child returns home.
Placement stability
Temporary placements are less likely than permanent placements to break down, probably because the period at risk is less (56).
Parents’ views
About 80 per cent of admissions into temporary foster care are made with the parents’ agreement, when children and young people are 'accommodated’ on a voluntary basis. Research shows that parents are frequently relieved (8), (57), (58) and some parents feel resentful if social workers refuse their request to support them in this way (57).
A study of short break foster care found that parents valued it highly. This scheme also provided good general social work support, which may have been another reason for user satisfaction (59). Parents do not necessarily see temporary care as a threat to the fundamental bonds of their family, unless court proceedings for a care order are initiated (58).
Not surprisingly parents feel much more negative when their children are compulsorily admitted to care, although this may change in time (57).
Children’s views
Children are less likely than their parents to favour temporary foster care. Research findings tell us that they may accept the situation and this will depend on their circumstances and whether their situation improves (59). They do not like sudden moves into care and moving placement without preparation. Like their parents they do not necessarily fear for the fundamental bonds of their family (58).
Ensuring 'temporary' foster care remains temporary
Research shows that parents may welcome temporary care and children can accept it. However, it has recently been found that children placed in so called 'temporary’ or 'short term’ foster care spent on average a year there (17).
This may be for a number of reasons. Usually the delay is caused by the need to resolve court proceedings or to decide if a permanent placement, rather than reunification, best meets the child’s needs. Sometimes the social worker is waiting to match the child to a more suitable placement.
There are now national standards and forthcoming guidance that insists that permanent plans for all children are made after four months, at the time of their second Looked After Child (LAC) review.
How to prevent children becoming 'accommodated’ and facilitating reunification
Studies (60-62) suggest that the features likely to create successful reunification are:
- purposeful and committed social work, which includes support to parents and carers, and using a multi-agency approach before, during and after placement
- the use of written agreements between social services, parents and children, as appropriate
- ensuring that contact between parents, child and foster carers takes place.
Research has not shown clear results about the effectiveness of offering therapeutic intervention to prevent or to shorten the time children spend in care. One study examined whether prevention and reunification could be achieved by offering intensive work based on learning, crisis and/or family therapy theories (63). The inconclusive results may also be because an appropriate intervention was not used, the intervention was not given effectively, or that the nature of the family problems were not solvable in the given time e.g. problems of substance misuse (64), (65).
- SHARE:
- Part of: Fostering
Last updated: November 2004
What happens when a child is taken into care?
There are a wide number of reasons that could lead to a child being taken into foster care, including parent illness, abandonment or incarceration. Other circumstances could be that the children may have been neglected and suffered from physical or emotional abuse.
While the reasons why social services intervene have become more widespread knowledge, there is still a degree of uncertainty over the processes after a child has been taken into care. That’s why we’ve put together this informational guide to address exactly what happens when a child is taken into care.
How a child can be taken into care
When the child is placed into the care system, a local authority assesses their individual situation to determine what type of foster care will best suit their needs. Any decisions made are done to ensure the child is safeguarded, protected and provided with a secure environment that acts as a substitute home.
Every fostering case is unique and what’s best for one child will differ from the next. If the child is able to return back to their parents, their foster care can be on a short-term, or emergency, basis. Alternatively, long-term fostering might be a more appropriate option if the child requires a longer period of extensive care.
If a child has been taken into foster care, regular contact will still be maintained with the biological family, if deemed appropriate. And, similarly, when the foster child has aged out of the fostering system, it’s not uncommon for foster parents to stay in the lives of the children they foster.
Next steps after a child is taken into care
When a child is taken into care, the local authority has a legal responsibility for that child. This means they will be involved in making the most important decisions for the child's welfare and upbringing, including:
- Who will be looking after the child going forwards
- Where they child will live
- How the child will be educated
The local authority and/or independent fostering agency will then also be responsible for:
- Ensuring that an appropriate standard of care is provided
- Ensuring that only suitable people are instructed to look after the child
- Supplying proper training and support to staff and foster carers
- Listening to the child’s and the parent’s views about care arrangements – as well as taking their religion, race, culture and background into account
- Making sure the child has someone independent to talk to and knows how to raise concerns if necessary
The local authority will then make arrangements for where the child will live, which could be with a parent, another family member or guardian who has parental responsibility, in a children’s home or in the care of a foster parent.
There’s no one-size-fits-all approach to fostering and different types of foster care placements are available to suit the needs of the child. Often, one type of foster care may develop into another – for example, you may begin on an emergency fostering placement which offers short-term care, usually on short notice. If the child needs an immediate placement, this could turn into short-term fostering – which can be as long as a few months.
Who can foster with FosterCare UK?
Looking to become a foster carer? Fostering is one of the most fulfilling jobs you can ever have as you have the chance to shape a young person’s life for the better. It’s a very personal profession that has many advantages for both the child and the carer.
In order to become a foster carer, you must meet the following criteria:
- Have a spare bedroom
- Be in good health
- Be at least 21 years of age
- Have enough time to provide support and care (usually on a full-time basis) to a child or young person
- Be a full-time resident in the UK (or have leave to remain)
Just like the children awaiting foster care, foster carers come from a diverse range of backgrounds and bring a wide range of life and work experiences. As long as you meet the initial criteria, your race, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, religion or ethnicity will not be a deciding factor. Learn more about the fostering requirements to consider before applying to foster.
Keen to chat to someone about what happens to children when they are taken into care, or about the fostering process in general? Get in touch with a member of our FosterCare UK team today – we’re happy to answer any questions you may have.
Selecting a child in an hour - why is it impossible in England
There is no secret of adoption. The average age of adoptive parents is 55 years. Even difficult teenage orphans study in ordinary schools. The removal of children from the family does not happen unexpectedly. Delinquent parents are helped to find resources to deal with the problem. Varvara Penzova, director of the Our Children Charitable Foundation, says after an internship in London.
How the film changed working with orphans
Great Britain is the birthplace of attachment theory, which fundamentally changes the approach to raising children, it is the place where the impact of orphanage education on children was first analyzed, and where the famous documentary film "John" was filmed in 1969.
In the film, a little boy living in an ordinary family suddenly finds himself in an institution. Before our eyes, during the 14 days of his stay there, he changes a lot, closes himself from communication, withdraws into himself. On the basis of these studies, the whole system of work with orphans and families in crisis has seriously changed throughout the country, and then all over the world.
I work for the Russian charitable foundation Our Children and am not an expert on the British system of working with families in crisis and orphans. In December, I attended an internship organized by the Timchenko Foundation, and I want to share what I saw in London's orphanages and foster agencies. This may give us food for thought.
Varvara Penzova
Difference No. 1: Don't punish parents, help them
A very important principle in the British guardianship system is to identify the problem at an early stage, when it is easiest to solve.
For example, when a child is just starting to skip school or when it becomes known that some tragedy has happened in the family.
All services that interact with children in one way or another are trained to recognize signs of child abuse or dysfunction in the family. If they are found, this information is reported to social services, after which the social educator collects data on what is happening with this family.
Let's say the mother didn't pick up the child from school. The teacher informs the social service about this and, according to the police act, the child can be removed without supervision for 72 hours - for this time he gets to a substitute family, which is ready to accept children in such emergency cases. Then the teacher explains what happened. Suppose there are objective reasons that prevented the mother from meeting the child: she had an accident, is in the hospital. Then it turns out who can take care of the child while the mother is away. Either the mother returned, the child was given away - the problem is resolved.
If it turns out that this is due to the neglect of parental responsibilities - the mother went on a spree, for example - then more detailed information is collected about what is happening in the family, about how this affects children, what resources the family has to cope with this .
A whole committee is assembled to make further decisions. A very important difference, in my opinion, is that the task of the commission is not to knock irresponsible parents on the head, but to help them see the problem and see their resources for solving it.
Psychologist, social pedagogue, representatives of medicine and police work with parents. Their task is to inspire the parent to change the situation on their own. For example, if the mother’s work schedule does not allow picking up the child from school on time, then she is helped to find someone in her environment who can replace her. The task is not to blame and punish the parent, but to offer him help.
Or, for example, a teenage child, and parents lack the competence to cope with a difficult adolescence. They are invited to special courses so that they learn more about this age and can build relationships with their son or daughter.
Assistance can also be in the form of money: social benefits or assistance in finding a job. There is a whole list of professions for which people are retrained, which contributes to their successful socialization. Then they can independently care for their child and provide him with everything necessary.
Difference No. 2: The main thing is that the child stays in the family
All efforts are aimed at helping the family to keep the child and learn how to take care of him and bring him up.
We were told an amazing story about a family where, among other problems, my mother had mental problems. Already three children of this couple had to be removed from the family: the problems could not be resolved, and for the safety of the children they were transferred to foster care, to foster families. And then the fourth baby was born. The family shows with all their behavior that they are ready to take care of him, that now everything will be different.
But mother, unfortunately, is not able to do it herself. For six months, a social worker was with the family during the daytime, helping to manage the household and take care of the baby. At night, the child was taken to a foster family. In such cases, specialists monitor the dynamics: six months are given to resolve the situation, and if there is at least some positive progress, then they continue to work with the family. If not - the parents do not fulfill their part of the obligations and do not change their behavior - then a decision is made to remove the child.
So, six months later, in this family, the father decided to part with the mother, but not to send the child to an institution, but to take over his upbringing. For a while, the social worker helped dad cope, and after a few months he was already able to live and care for the baby on his own. Six months of work of social services - and the child grows up in a family with his own father.
The main tenet of the system is that most families are able to take care of their children on their own with a little help.
Difference #3: No “ghettos” for orphans and children with special needs!
The big difference from the system adopted in our country is that in the UK no one seeks to create closed institutions for children with certain characteristics. There are correctional schools in the country, but their number is declining. Everything is aimed at integrating people with special needs into everyday life.
The task of the entire system is to prepare them as much as possible for life in the ordinary world. This also applies to difficult teenagers with antisocial behavior. Even the most difficult teenagers in the orphanage where we were - often with a criminal past, with some serious psychological problems - are taught to live, study and work in society.
Difference No. 4: The removal of a child does not become a shock for the family
If there are problems in the family, and after six months of support by psychologists and other specialists there is no positive dynamics, the case is referred to the court. It is very important that when it comes to the court for the removal of a child, it does not become a shock, surprise or surprise either for the family or for the child himself.
Because at each stage of work with the family, they discuss the actions and responsibilities of each person involved and the options for consequences in a particular case. And this is an important difference from our system.
It often happens that, when coming to a dysfunctional family, a well-meaning caregiver says to the child, for example: “We'll go to the hospital with you, the doctor will see you. It's not for long!" - while she herself already knows perfectly well that the child is being seized. That he would spend the next few months in an orphanage.
If the representatives of guardianship themselves do not know how it will end for the child, it is necessary to say it honestly, at a level that is accessible to him. We are already working on such algorithms. Of course, when the removal of a child from the family is associated with an immediate threat to his life, there is simply no time for long work and preparation. But in such a situation, I think specialists should also be ready to honestly answer the child's questions. The main thing is not to lie. Lies for good, as far as I understand, are unacceptable in the British system.
Difference #5: Children…and babies are taken into account
avoid subjectivity.
What is more interesting: when assessing the situation and making a decision, the desire of children, expressed verbally or non-verbally (if it is an infant or a child who cannot speak), is taken into account. The specialist looks at how he interacts with his relatives, how they react to them: whether he catches the eye of an adult, smiles, reaches out to his parents, or gets scared, hides, avoids looking, or even completely indifferent.
Difference No. 6: The biological parent, who was not in the life of the child, cannot take him away stolen and raised by a woman who lost her own child. It is not known how this case will end.
But in Britain, for example, the principle of keeping the best interests of the child and the importance of the permanence of his environment means that the biological parent, who was completely absent from the life of the child, does not have any preferential rights to return him to himself.
For example, a parent was in prison, did not contact the child, was not interested in him, the child was brought up in a foster family for all 3 years of his life. In such a situation, the biological parent does not have priority rights to his child, he cannot return him to himself only on the grounds that he is the father. Because the child already has an established environment, relationships, why on earth should he be transferred to an actual stranger?
Difference No. 7: Most of the removed children are returned to their families of origin
2/3 of cases handled by social workers end with the return of children to their families. They note that working with the family is most effective in the first 3-6 months after opening a case. But the work can take longer if needed.
We are very glad that these data echo the conclusions that we made based on the results of work in the Smolensk region. Our psychologists and social educators work with children who are already permanently in the orphanage, but even in this case there are successful stories of returning children to their birth families. And the less the child is in the institution, the greater the chance to return him.
And this means that if you go to shelters and rehabilitation centers where children go temporarily, or to family support services where parents go in a crisis, then the chance to save families will be even higher.
Difference No. 8: Parental rights are not deprived!
If, nevertheless, the family cannot cope, then a special court is convened (the judges participating in it also undergo retraining and deal exclusively with similar issues), and there a decision can be made to establish state supervision of the child and move him to be raised in another family.
Biological parents do not lose their rights. Just for a while, state law prevails over parental law.
That is, you cannot deprive your parental rights. There is no such thing! State supervision over the family may be established. But a parent is always a parent. Exception: the case of adoption - then parental rights are completely transferred to another family.
Difference #9: Three quarters of orphans are raised in foster families
In Britain, if a family cannot raise a child, first of all, his relatives are searched for, even neighbors, teachers, families of close school friends - the entire usual social circle of the child is moved. If it is impossible to arrange with friends, then a foster family is selected.
Recently, adoption is considered an extremely undesirable form of child placement, because it violates his rights - it breaks his connection with the birth family.
More than 75 percent of children who do not live with their parents are raised in foster families. However, the blood family does not completely disappear from the child's life: if communication with the family is possible, if it is safe for the child, then it occurs in a limited way.
In Russia, most of these children still live in institutions - this is the main form of placement for orphans in our country. And, as a rule, communication with relatives, unfortunately, is interrupted.
Our foundation is in the process of reuniting orphans with their relatives, because without this the problem with orphans cannot be solved. Our experience of working with children in an orphanage shows that guardianship authorities often do nothing to find relatives, although they are there and could maintain contact with the children.
Difference No. 10: No more than three foster children per family
The main requirement for a foster family is a free room. A foster child must have their own room. At the same time, more than three foster children cannot be placed in one family at the same time, even if conditions allow.
One of the priorities is not to separate brothers and sisters if possible. What if there are four of them? Only three can be arranged in a family ... Each case is considered individually. Sometimes priorities conflict with each other. Let's say one of them has needs that can't be met outside of London.
And in London there are not many families ready to accept several children - there are not so many free rooms. Assess what is more important: keeping the brother and sister together or separating them to provide for the special needs of one of them - for example, a special school. Priority is determined by the municipality.
A social pedagogue is appointed to curate the case. And if there are several children, then there are several curators - for each child. The case of each child is considered separately, because even in the same family, children can have a big difference in age and not communicate much, or, for example, some children lived with their grandparents, others lived with their father and mother, and also not very familiar.
The needs of the individual child are considered. It is the social service that determines what services he needs: maybe he needs a speech therapist, or a psychologist, or some kind of special medical supervision. Therefore, when looking for a substitute family, the state is looking for the possibility of maximum satisfaction of these needs. Including, they try to preserve as much as possible - if it is safe for the child - his environment: so that he stays to live in the same area of the city where he lived, goes to the same school, so that, in addition to changing adults caring for him, his life changes minimally.
Photo: londonfamilyphotography.co.uk
Difference No. 11: One person checks and accompanies a foster family
In Britain there are state and non-state agencies for preparing and accompanying adoptive parents - foster agencies. It is very important that the functions of preparation and support are combined in one place!
This means that those people who prepare the family for a new status and assess its resources accompany this family when orphans come to it, they are also responsible for the quality of placement (the length of stay of children in the family, their well-being in it, etc.). That is, people initially have an idea about the family, contact is established with it, there is an understanding of what can be expected from whom, they are emotionally oriented towards each other. It turns out that they evaluate and prepare the family to receive children and are responsible for the quality of this assessment and preparation!
While we have schools for foster parents, this is still a separate institution that issues a piece of paper about passing. On the formal basis of the presence of this piece of paper, the guardianship authorities give the go-ahead for the adoption of a child, not even being really familiar with this family.
Difference No. 12: Documents and certificates are collected by the agency
Every family that has a free room and the necessary conditions can apply to the foster agency and become adoptive parents. The first face-to-face acquaintance with representatives of guardianship authorities takes place on the territory of a potential foster family. This makes it possible for the family to feel calm and confident, and for the specialist to get much more information about how they live.
Next comes the stage of collecting documents - it is carried out not by the family, but by representatives of the agency.
The specialist seeks information from the police, the place of work, and the clinic, and collects feedback from neighbors, friends, relatives. And the family is just waiting - the process takes up to 8 months.
Then they take a basic course of study - 8 or 10 blocks. But in general, foster families are constantly learning. Let's say you took a 7-year-old kid, but time passes - and he is already a teenager: other questions and problems arise before you.
Foster families are in constant contact with the agency. The social worker visits the family at least 14 times a year, 12 of them by agreement with the family, and 2 times without warning. This is a standardized approach.
The foster parent keeps a diary about the child's life. Let's say: “I came from school; got sick; today he communicated well with the neighbor's children, ”and he is certified by a social worker weekly. That is, the contact between the family and the social worker is very tight!
Difference #13: The average age of adoptive parents is 55 years old
The average age of adoptive parents is 55 years old.
No maximum age limit.
We were told about an elderly lady, an employee of the agency, through which more than 100 children passed. It is clear that she does not accommodate small children for a long period, but she is a parent who can take children in emergency cases for short-term placement.
Difference #14: Adopters of only blue-eyed, healthy babies with good genetics are rejected
We have a queue of adoptive parents who want to take home blue-eyed, healthy babies from a well-to-do family - that is, without “bad genetics”. In England, if a family sets such conditions at an interview, they are told:
“You know, we have no need for raising such children. The main contingent is teenagers, children of migrants, antisocial children. So if you're clearly targeting blue-eyed girls, I'm sorry - we can't help you."
They are not even taken to teach - such parents are simply not taken into this system. Those who are hired are ready to cover real needs, and not satisfy their desire to raise a certain type of children.
What kind of children will be given to one or another foster family is determined by the results of training and interaction of the family with a specialist. Suppose parents want to take a teenager, but during the conversations it turns out that they are emotionally unstable people and will not be able to resist some kind of aggressive manifestations that occur in adolescence. So, they will accommodate the kids. Or, for example, a family does not mind taking a child with special needs, but their house is not suitable for him - there is no elevator or no ramp. They, of course, will not give such a child to raise.
Each family has a profile. There is a base where their “professional qualifications” are indicated - what type of children and for how long they are ready to accept. For example, there is an emergency type of placement: when a child is removed from a dysfunctional family, he is in a state of stress, and you should try to calm him down and be prepared for the fact that he will not make contact. Or this is a short-term withdrawal from the family - while the parents are solving some problems - for 1-2 months: in this case, you should be prepared for the fact that you cannot become attached to him tightly, that you will have to return him to your parents.
The task of the agency is to determine these categories for each family. That is, it turns out that not a child is selected for a family, but a family for a child! Each case of a social worker is a case of a child, not a family.
Difference #15: There is no mystery of adoption
There is no mystery of adoption, this is considered unacceptable, and the work is to leave no chance for the child to grow up without knowing that he was adopted.
This is why it is said from the very beginning, the child grows up with this information, without perceiving it as a kind of shock. This is constantly talked about with him, in different ways, depending on age, but for him this is never news.
It excludes the situation when, in adolescence, a person suddenly accidentally finds out that he is not native, and that his close people have been lying to him all his life. The consequences of such news - psychological trauma and a break with relatives - are very difficult to overcome later. And when a child grows up knowing that he is not his own, there is no trauma, and this does not interfere with emotional closeness with foster parents.
Difference #16: Child benefits cover all child expenses
Foster parents receive a salary and money to support the child. But at the same time, foster families must have an alternative source of income, that is, they must not depend on payments for the child.
Weekly payments come from the municipality - from the place where a dysfunctional family is identified. The social worker, together with the family, draws up a financial plan for managing children's money - calculates how much the child will go for pocket expenses, and how much they should save as his savings for the future. The money for the maintenance of the child fully covers the costs of the family for him, the purpose of the plan is to show how they can be managed without limiting the child, but without involving the alternative income of the adoptive parent. No one asks for checks!
But in the communication, which takes place at least once a month, the social worker looks at how the child is dressed, what his room looks like, what he eats. If something worries the specialist, he can increase the number of visits to the family, come without the consent of the family, for example, at lunchtime - to see what the child is fed, or during joint family events - to see how they communicate, what emotions they have relation to each other.
As far as I understood, complaints: “Yeah, you take children into the family not for love, but for money!” – are also heard in Britain. But experts answer them: “We select foster parents, we control them, we are the same who taught them: we know these people. And then, there are a lot of easier ways to make money than looking after abandoned, difficult children.”
In our country, due to the separation of the functions of checking the family and its support, abuse is possible: when a family from the village, having no other source of income, takes orphans to raise. And at the same time, a negative attitude (and often from their own guardianship!) - “taken for money” - haunts many wonderful families who put their heart and soul into raising adopted children.
Difference #17: Foster Family Cannot Move Without Guardian Permission
Any foster family is hired. She does not have full rights to the child and cannot make a number of decisions for him.
This rule is now being reviewed, adjusted in Britain, because it causes some problems. For example, it turned out that foster families have to coordinate too much with the municipality, which worsens the situation of children.
The class is traveling and the foster parent must apply to the municipality for permission to send the child with the class. While the approvals are underway, everyone has already left! Or a parent can't let a foster child go to a friend's sleepover. Now the British are reviewing this situation so that foster moms and dads have more freedom, and such restrictions do not worsen the position of adopted children relative to blood.
Since the family is rented, the issue of moving to another city is also coordinated with the municipality. It is preferable that the family moves with the child, of course, but if there are no conditions in the new city to meet his needs, a refusal may follow. The family must be checked at the foster agency in the new location, all information about them is transferred there. And the municipality must give its consent to the move.
Difference #18: Families prepare special meals for young parents
Parents who, for some reason, cannot take care of the child on their own, can be placed in foster families. For example, young parents: a 15-year-old orphan girl and her newborn child.
We had such cases in the Smolensk region. In one case, a girl who had recently given birth from an orphanage, along with a boyfriend, the father of the child, ended up in a foster family, but did not take root there - apparently, it was difficult for them to adjust to the family way after so many years in the orphanage. And in another case, a girl from the institution lives with her baby in a foster family.
But we consider such situations as a special case, out of the ordinary, and there - the possibility of such an arrangement is taken into account, it is assessed whether certain adoptive parents are ready to accept such teenagers. That is, in our country, first a case occurs, and then a family is searched for it, and their families are prepared for such cases.
Difference No. 19: Helping a troubled child to integrate into normal life
If a child does not take root in a foster family, if he has such complex psychological characteristics or disorders that no efforts of social services help, he is placed in an institution. Ours is an orphanage. But this is not some institution far from the city.
This is an ordinary house on an ordinary street, without any markings - it does not stand out in any way. Up to 6 (!) adolescent children live there, who have already had to go through a rather difficult life path: some of them participated in crimes, were members of gangs, some were involved in drug trafficking, some were engaged in self-mutilation - they inflicted injuries, there are children who have been sexually abused and exploited, children who often run away from foster families and have problems with the law.
The main task of this orphanage is to help such children to believe in themselves.
They were abandoned by their families and adoptive parents, they have low self-esteem, they feel worthless. Specialists in the orphanage work so that such children accept themselves as they are, accept the circumstances of their lives and everything that happened in it, learn to cope with their emotions, manage their lives, behavior, money, learn to choose friends correctly and, most importantly, merged into normal life.
In especially severe cases, the child goes to an orphanage with tutors, but in order to still go to study where everyone studies, get a profession where everyone gets it, learn to live in the real world, and not in an artificially created for his space. There are no special schools at the orphanage; children go to ordinary educational institutions.
Difference No. 20: Whether to clean the room is the choice of the child
An important condition for raising difficult teenagers, even in an institution, is respect for their boundaries and freedom.
Although difficult teenagers with a criminal record wear a special police bracelet to control their movements. However, personal freedom is respected.
So a child's room is his space, where an adult cannot enter without knocking. We often have the director of the orphanage leading the inspectors or volunteers through all the rooms: “Meet the children!”, And this happens several times a week. Right there - we were not even offered to come in, with or without a knock. There are no attempts to invade their personal space!
Children are given pocket money, but if they break the rules, they can spend it only under supervision. The amount of pocket money depends on their behavior: let's say no one forces children to clean their room, but everyone knows that if you don't clean the room, the amount of pocket money will be less. That is, instead of punishment - choice.
12 caregivers for 4 children, two of them are with the children at night and three during the day. In our sponsored orphanage, the role of an educator is very often performed by a video camera, which kills the meaning of the home conditions that they are trying to create there. We often take a formal approach.
In 2015, the Decree of the Government No. 481 of the Russian Federation “On the activities of organizations for orphans” appeared, and it, in particular, implies the creation of conditions in the institution that are close to family ones. But this respect for the child's personal space is still in its infancy.
Orphanage should stop being the norm
It is believed that our guardianship system is about 50 years behind the British in development. But it was gratifying to know that this was not entirely true. The British system itself began to change relatively recently - the so-called Children's Act came into force only in 1989, that is, less than 30 years ago.
Today our country is beginning to move in the same direction, but work often begins at the moment when the child has already entered the institution, and not at the moment when some crisis has just begun in the family.
Decree No. 481, which appeared in 2015, essentially changes the role of the orphanage in a child's life, positions it as a temporary device, which should also be minimally different from a family stay. But the main goal is to stop being in an orphanage and be perceived as a normal, stable situation.
We already have an understanding of the benefits of a child's life in a family, and not in an institution, we have already come to the topic of preserving the birth family. But ideologically and everywhere this has not yet been accepted: it is still believed that collective education is sometimes better than family education, that a good orphanage is better than a poor family.
In our country, unfortunately, the functions of guardianship authorities are reduced to control - there is actually no assistance and support. And the foster family, raising a child, is faced with a huge number of issues that develop into difficulties - they have no one to go to with this, so as not to get hit on the head, not to achieve increased attention to them from the guardianship authorities and the removal of the child, but to get help. The results of the work of our club of foster families in Safonovo shows that very often psychological support is enough for the family to have the strength to overcome the problem.
Prepared by Valeria Mikhailova
Since you are here...
We have a small request. This story was told thanks to the support of readers. Even the smallest monthly donation helps editorial work and create important content for people.
Your help is needed now more than ever.
what you should know about local social services
backBookmark
Photo: shutterstockCompliance with the laws and traditions of the country you have moved to is a completely logical and reasonable requirement. What about raising your own children? Sometimes educational measures that seem normal in the CIS countries can be perceived in Britain as an offense and lead to disastrous consequences. Portal "Abroad" tells what you need to know about English social services and how to behave in case of problems with them
Adaptation to another culture and traditions is considered one of the main problems of immigrants at first. Especially in such a distinctive country as Great Britain. Sometimes this process can last for years, turning into a protracted nostalgia for the homeland. However, even in the case of quickly getting used to a new life, people from the CIS countries (and not only them) are very careful about their own traditions, trying not to forget about their roots.
Photo: shutterstockViews on the upbringing of children well illustrate the differences in mentality among residents of the CIS countries and the UK. Try to tell our compatriot that he is raising a child incorrectly or should not scold him! At best, you will be advised to mind your own business. In Britain, things are somewhat different.
If your neighbors suddenly feel that you are being too strict with your child, raising your voice to him, or even leaving him at home unattended for several hours, they may well complain about you to social services. The trouble is that the employees of the British services for the protection of children's rights, unlike their colleagues in the CIS countries, are very zealous in their duties. Yes, and the legislation in England is not like ours: the issues of raising children are considered here not only as an intra-family matter, but also as a state matter.
In general, the obligations of parents to care for a child in the UK are not much different from the requirements in the CIS countries. However, what we have written only on paper, in Britain is a mandatory norm. On the Web, you can easily find many terrible stories about the deprivation of the parental rights of quite trustworthy people by the British authorities.
Photo: shutterstockSo let's take a look at a small but important list of parenting in the UK:
- provide a home for the child;
- provide proper care for the child;
- name the child and agree on name changes;
- consent to the treatment of the child;
- choose and provide for the education of the child;
- discipline a child;
- look after the child's property;
- provide financial support for the child.
If it seems to social services that parents are not coping with their duties, a very unpleasant and complicated procedure for the restriction or deprivation of parental rights begins.
What to do in such a situation?
In the case of foreigners, local authorities and the court can and should take into account some cultural differences, but this clause does not always help.
Negative outcome of the case: what's next?
In the worst case for the parents, the court decides to issue a care order. Then a decision is made where the child will live. It can be left with one of the parents, relatives, friends and other persons whom the child knows.
If there are no suitable candidates, local authorities send the child to foster parents (foster parent) or to an orphanage. This can be either temporary or long term. Foster caregivers are carefully selected by the local authorities, but their marital status does not play any role: caregivers can be married couples, single men or women, and same-sex couples.